The remarkable development in digital lending in India can be attributed to the fact that nearly everyone, even in the most rural places, has a smartphone and quick access to the internet, making it possible to obtain digital credit with a few screen taps. According to statista (as seen on December 2024) Digital loans grew from $9 billion in 2012 to about $150 billion in 2020 and was valued at $270 billion in 2023. By 2030, the market is expected to reach $515 billion.These staggering figures demonstrate the quick growth of digital financing, but they also pose an important question: what is encouraging borrowers to trust these platforms and adopt them so quickly and in such large numbers?
The answer to this is explained by behavioral economics – defined in the oxford dictionary asa method of economic analysis that applies psychological insights into human behaviour to explain economic decision-making. Its basically the study of how psychological, emotional, and cognitive factors influence financial decision-making. This theory does not regard human beings as rational decision-makers; rather, it uses the borrower’s psychology, emotional triggers, and biases to justify their financial decisions. Ease of access, instant loan approval, and persuasive marketing strategies promote these behavioral tendencies, which are based on instant gratification of needs. They are also irrational, as this short-term satisfaction may not be financially feasible in the long run.
The existing studies on the behavior of consumers towards borrowing and digital lending have outlined some key insights. The desire for constant gratification of the borrowers is fed by the accessibility of these digital lending platforms, which causes certain biases to drive the borrower’s decisions. For example, present bias—prioritizes present needs and desires and ignores the long-term costs of them. Cognitive biases like anchoring (fixating on initial offers) and optimism bias (overestimating repayment ability). Understanding the true implications of repayment terms, interest rates, and fees can prove to be very difficult to the layman and this very limited financial literacy further magnifies the problem. These platforms gain control over the psyche of the borrower by aggressively marketing digital credit by introducing personalized ads that directly feed the desires of the borrowers and make them more inclined to make impulsive decisions by using “limited period” offers. As a result of these tactics People easily trust these platforms and tend to turn a blind eye towards high interest rates and misuse of data. An increasing prevalence of debt traps is also noted by these studies. When a person is too deep into debt and personally cannot finance the repayment he turns to these platforms for more credit using it to repay his already existing debt, which leads to a debt cycle. The psychological biases described above are also increasingly exploited by these platforms for instance, present bias is encouraged by providing quick and easy loans with rapid approval which takes the attention away from repayment and interest. Another type of bias is availability bias – relying on shallow information that is easily available and endorsed by these platforms like marketing schemes and online reviews rather than thoroughly understanding the complete terms and conditions of the loan. Platforms use this bias for their own profit by heavily endorsing low monthly installments which takes away the focus from high interest and penalties..to counter the rapidly increasing debt risks among the masses, the poor level of financial literacy needs urgent attention. Only then the borrower will be able to analyze the true risk and profits of taking credit; they need to be able to understand the complexities of loan terms to make informed choices. Further, this can only be made possible when the lending platforms increase transparency in credit terms and provide holistic information.
For example, let’s take a look at the aggressive marketing strategies of popular digital lending platforms such as Paytm and Cashbean. Paytm makes use of personalized push notifications to endorse quick and easy loans with “no hidden charges”, “paperless credit” and “instant disbursal”. The content of such notifications is like- “You’re pre-approved for ₹50,000 instant credit! Apply now with no documents required.” such notifications entice users to act immediately. Cashbean, on the other hand, has a narrow focus on the tech-savvy youth which has a prominent presence on social media. They use persuasive social media campaigns and SMS campaigns to offer quick cash for their urgent needs. Their campaign taglines such as “Seamless Loans for Your Immediate Needs” and “Your go-to app for fast cash”, by using such lines they exploit the urgency and impulsivity of the borrower which further leads them into a debt trap
.
All platforms like these need to adhere to the consumer protection laws. It is legally mandatory for them to provide clear transparency over interest rates, loan terms, and all other implications and penalties. Regulatory guidelines released by the Reserve Bank of India also emphasized the same. Despite all this, these platforms have found a way to bypass true transparency by using fine print for terms and a language too complex for the layperson to comprehend. Legal action against these platforms can be taken under the Consumer Protection Act when practices like unauthorized fees or exorbitantly high interest rates are found. Other ethical concerns regarding data privacy which involve these platforms collecting personal information about the borrowers without adequate consent and further exposing them to the risk of misuse of their data, are not paid much attention.
In conclusion, lending platforms need to enhance their financial literacy and transparency regarding the consumers who may benefit from their services to create a healthier economic environment. Creating age-specific educational resources on the lending platforms would be one innovative mechanism for making sure that users clearly understand the terms and consequences of the loans they are borrowing. On top of that, making all fees, interest rates, and repayment options both clear and accessible would improve trust by enabling borrowers to make the right choices about their borrowing options. Organizing frequent workshops, online tutorials, and the inclusion of user-friendly tools such as calculators for estimating total loan costs would help demystify the lending process. Education and transparent lending practices are meant to protect the consumer, but they also help create a more well-informed and financially savvy society at large.
Leave feedback about this